One reason why we chose this issue was because it was
something that was different and not commonly talked about in the discussion of
sport and education. Carmen and I first wanted to explore the issues around
academic fraud and student integrity however, after researching this topic we
found that it was very commonly discussed and we wanted to find something that
was a little different. We then decided to focus on the draft requirements for
the BIG 3 and the issues it has within collegiate sport. I personally had some
familiarization with draft rules mainly within MLB and knew that there were
drafts for the NBA and Combines for football but never knew in detail what the
requirements were. Which in this case the topic became very foreign to me. It
was interesting to find out that the draft requirements strongly imply that
getting a college education and or just going to college is the only way to get
drafted. Which then in turn makes most BCS and elite basketball schools farm
teams for professional sports organizations.
Prior to the experience of facilitation I thought that
Carmen and I spent an abundant amount of time research and reading articles to
make sure we were fully prepared for the discussion. Going into the discussion
of course, I was nervous and worrying about if we covered everything prior to
make sure we weren’t hit with any questions we couldn’t answer. I think because this topic was very different
and out of some student’s realms, it made it a bit difficult to start the
conversation once we opened into our large circle. But as the conversation started to flow and
take off it was much easier to sit back and listen and take notes. I think one element that was hard was making
sure we were staying on track. At times I think we went a little off course and
drifted away from our scenario topic. However at times it was ok because we
understood that we did not have a lecture before this class some of the other
topics that are around sport and education would arise and in which lead into some
of our discussion questions. In the future, I would suggest making sure we are
spending our time discussing on the topic at hand and being aware of our time.
I think that it helped when Killick was there at the end of class to capture
and summarize those main points that we have missed.
During the discussion I thought Carmen and I did a good job
of planning small group activities at the beginning and end of the lesson. I
think the small groups help the students feel more comfortable discussing what
they researched and be able to share ideas and thoughts others may bring up
more intimately. So when they join as an entire class students have support
from their group and have received maybe a different side of thinking already.
I think one thing that helped Carmen and I during the discussion process was
how much we met and discussed our topic. We became very familiar with our topic
and made sure we planned a quality lesson for our students. And because of that
we were able to push the class more diligently and have them think more
critically about the social problems that exist within the collegiate sport
complex.
One thing I want to do is thank Carmen for pushing me to
think more critically. It was very difficult for me just being a recently
retired athlete to see and understand all the issues that arise with playing an
elite sport. And to think critically about this certain issue as an former
athlete was very mind blowing. As I was trying to take everything in from the
discussion and digest all the information, I was glad Carmen was by my side to
help facilitate the discussion.
You did a great job Kortney and this is an appropriate reflection of your facilitation strengths and weaknesses- I appreciate that you and Carmen choose Sport& Education as it really did push you to think beyond your own personal (most positive) experiences and look at the public issues that arise within the NCAA. Nice topic choice too- it was great to examine a different angle of the NCAA's operation.
ReplyDelete